And he has a 35, yeah, 34 point take profit. So, finally something balanced here. Pound dollar. He has here a 20 point stop loss, and he has 72 pip take profit, and another balanced one here, with relatively balanced here.
Just a little over positive here. So, a bunch of trades with no stop losses. In fact, he had 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 trades with no stop losses. Two of 'em were inverted, one of 'em was balanced, and only three had actually balanced risk to reward ratios Casinoslots South Africa. Here's the third set of trades. These are actually part of his last crude oil trades that were balanced. And then here we are again. He has about a 50 pip, or a 45 pip stop loss, and he ends up adjusting his target into the negatives so he can get out early. Euro-US dollar, he has about a hundred point stop loss, and he has a relatively break-even or slightly negative take profit. So he adjusted that to get out early. This one is balanced. This one, he has a, what is that? 300 and, it's 280 plus, 340 pip stop loss. And he ended up moving his target into the negatives just to get out of the trade. Aussie-Kiwi, he has a 240 pip stop loss, and he has 140 pip target here. So a 2X stop loss in relationship to his target. Same thing here. Relatively same thing here. I grouped these all as one trade. Another Aussie-Kiwi trade. I had anger about this 'cause it was five days later. And it's also a higher price. And he has a 279 pip stop loss, and 100 pip target. So, his stop loss is 2.7 times larger than his take profit. Here he has about a 385 pip stop loss, and he ended up moving his take profit into the negative just so he could get out of the trade. Three group trades on NASDAQ. Here he has a hundred pip, a hundred point stop loss. And he has a 25 point target. So, a 4X, the stop loss is four times greater than his target. Pound-dollar. He has 580 point stop loss, and he has a 120 point target. I just, I don't even know what to say about this. Stop loss is five times greater than his target. And here he has no stop loss, and he has only a take profit. So, not one trade on this page here has a positive risk to reward ratio. He only has one neutral, and he has 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 inverted, and one with no stop loss. So, you do the math on that. Okay, and this is the last page. This dollar-yen is part of the prior page. He has a euro-pound trade, 150 pip stop loss, 48 pip target. His stop loss is three times larger than his take profit. This one is even. This one is, he has a 125 pip stop loss, and he has a 75 pip take profit. So, his stop loss is 2X. DAX trade here, grouped, he has a 300 point stop loss, and he only has a 70 point target. So his stop loss is four times greater than his take profit. Completely inverted. NIKAY trade. No stop loss or take profit. And then finally has a trade with a favourable risk to reward ratio. Now what that ends up coming out to is, while there are a total of 50 individual trades, when you start to group it all together, the real number of total trades was 35. And he had 19 total traded instruments. Now, out of 35 trades, the total number of inverted risk to reward ratio trades: 18. So in other words, one out of every two trades of his has completely inverted risk to reward ratios. I want you to think about that for a second. 51% of Nial Fuller's trades had upside down risk to reward ratios. Out of 35 trades, the total number of trades with no stop loss, no take profit, or both: 10. So in other words, 29% of Nial Fuller's trades had no stop loss, no take profit, or both. One in three chance. And then when we look at it a little bit further, total number of trades with even R to R ratios: five. So only 14% of his trades had an even R to R ratio, meaning that the stop loss was the exact same as the take profit. Total number of trades with favourable risk to reward ratios, mean that the take profit was greater than the stop loss: three. So only nine percent of his trades had a favourable risk to reward ratio. Now we're gonna get into some other stats shortly, but those numbers alone should be horrifying to you. That means he trades nothing like he says in his articles there. In fact, when you start to go over some of these trades, what you start to realise is, you know, look at some of these trades, you know, he enters at 9:48, and he's out six hours later, eight hours later. He was in a 4:25, and this one he actually held for a few days. But look at this one here. He's in a 10:23, he's out an hour and 30 minutes later. He's in at 14:57, he's out roughly a day later. He's in a 10:23, he's out roughly a day later. So, you're talking someone who is constantly managing their trades, not holding them to their stop loss or take profit, not letting them breathe. This isn't someone who's being disciplinary, sticking to their trading plan. This is someone who's frantically getting out of trades, with completely inverted risk to reward ratios. Someone who has no respect for risk management here. This is not a professional trader here. And there's something ironic about, because his most recent article was: Let the market take you out of your trade. In fact, it even says as a bold headliner: Why you should almost never manually close your trades. And then he talks about, and he goes into a nice little recap here, and he says, look, you know, here are the main take-aways from this: Good trades often take time to play out, often longer than you usually want. Okay, if that's the case, then how come you closed the majority of your trades early?
0 Comments
|
Friends sitehttps://www.casinoslots.co.nz/ Archives
March 2019
Categories |